Athletics & Padres

Submitted by: andyinfremont

Athletics

NameAgeLevelP1P2AvailabilityYearsAFVSalarySurplusLowMedianHigh
MacKenzie GoreMinorsLHP13.911.113.916.7
Wil Myers30MajorsOFHigh28.221-12.8-15.4-12.8-10.2

Total Value:

1.1

Padres

NameAgeLevelP1P2AvailabilityYearsAFVSalarySurplusLowMedianHigh
Grant HolmesMinorsRHP0.50.30.50.7

Total Value:

0.5

You found a premium feature!

Want an ad-free experience, with access to our premium features, like the Team Rankings, GM Override, Player Rankings, and Future Trade/Free Agent/Extension Values Graphs?

aautry169

If the A's are going to tank and do a complete rebuild, the last thing they would want is Myers' contract.

General Manager Badge
grover

I disagree. If the A's are going to tank and start a complete rebuild AND they have the payroll space (which is doubtful) then buying a prospect by taking on a bad contract, 1 year contract is classic rebuild strategy.

andyinfremont

Yes, the purpose of posting this trade was to demonstrate how the A's could speed a rebuild by taking on a bad 1-year contract. It only makes sense if either: 1. The A's trade enough of their most expensive players (Olson, Chapman, Bassitt, Manaea, etc...) to be able to fit Myers into the payroll, or 2. The new CBA includes a salary floor that forces the A's to increase their payroll. Personally, I don't think the A's will do a full tear-down rebuild, because that's not how they have done their rebuilds in the past 20+ years. Unless a salary-floor in imposed, they will more likely trade a few expensive players and use the returning assets to partially re-charge the farm system while also keeping the current club theoretically competitive.

NEWSLETTER? SURE, SIGN ME UP!