Red Sox & Mets
Submitted by: TC392
Red Sox
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Lindor | 32 | Majors | SS | Low | 6 | 245 | 206.8 | 38.2 | 30.6 | 38.2 | 45.9 |
Total Value:
38.2
Mets
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kutter Crawford | 30 | Majors | LRP | Medium | 3 | 33 | 13.1 | 19.9 | 15.9 | 19.9 | 23.9 | |
| Patrick Sandoval | 29 | Majors | SP | Medium | 1 | 17.3 | 12.8 | 4.5 | 3.6 | 4.5 | 5.4 | |
| Romy Gonzalez | 29 | Majors | UTIL | OF | Medium | 3 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 10.4 | 13 | 15.6 |
Total Value:
37.4
Comments
4In what way does this make any sense for the Mets
NEWSLETTER? SURE, SIGN ME UP!
In the same way the Roman Anthony proposal two rows above helps the Red Sox.
Idk what trade youre talking about but the Mets don’t need a washed up SP5. A fringe SP5 and a significantly worse infielder for a franchise cornerstone…lmao just looked. That is also a miserable proposal
Sounds like you take exception with the platform you are posting on then. This was posted somewhat tongue in cheek as a response to that Anthony trade