Twins & Mets
Submitted by: IPA
Twins
Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boston Baro | 20 | Minors | SS | 2B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.3 | 5.9 | 7.3 | 8.8 | |
Eli Serrano III | 22 | Minors | OF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.2 | 6.6 | 8.2 | 9.8 |
Total Value:
15.5
Mets
Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pablo Lopez | 29 | Majors | SP | Medium | 2 | 50.3 | 43 | 7.3 | 5.8 | 7.3 | 8.7 | |
Cole Sands | 27 | Majors | RP | Medium | 3 | 18.5 | 12.9 | 5.6 | 4.5 | 5.6 | 6.7 |
Total Value:
12.90
Comments
5would love this for the mets
Maybe have twins take back Montas to reduce payroll implications, twins still save 4 mill this year and 21 million in 2027
@JohnBitzer. I really wish you could better define the thumbs up thumbs down. Is a a thumbs up what the team is getting? Is it a thumbs down on what the team is trading away? As in, there are 1 thumbs up and 4 thumbs down for the package going to Minny. Is this Mets fans not wanting to give up those prospects? Is this Minny fans not liking the package in return? Anyway, food for thought.
Thanks for the feedback. We don't limit the reasons for voting one way or the other, so currently anyone can like or dislike for any reason, and the comments section is typically for those who want to expound on it. The volume of votes isn't that high right now, so we're hesitant to change it. That said, you make great points, and we'll add it to our discovery backlog.
This is more of a Twins rejigger for them to save cash/soft rebuild. Mets, in theory, can float the added salary. I targeted Sands in this deal as well because they have 3/4 of a BP to rebuild too.