Phillies & Athletics
Submitted by: Abrown222213
Phillies
Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mason Miller | 25 | Majors | RP | 4.7 | 76.3 | 43.1 | 33.2 | 26.5 | 33.2 | 39.8 |
Total Value:
33.2
Athletics
Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Seth Johnson | 25 | Majors | RP | 5.7 | 3.2 | 0 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 3.8 | ||
Mick Abel | 23 | Majors | SP | 0 | 10.2 | 0 | 10.2 | 8.1 | 10.2 | 12.2 | ||
Justin Crawford | 20 | Minors | OF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.7 | 11.8 | 14.7 | 17.7 | ||
Griffin Burkholder | 19 | Minors | CF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.3 | 5.9 | 7.3 | 8.8 |
Total Value:
35.4
Comments
3I'm still not a fan of trading Mason Miller but I think building a package around Crawford and Abel makes sense, based on how the A's tend to build trades. Burkholder doesn't work because of Crawford's inclusion (I see one or the other and proximity to the Show gives the nod to Crawford).
Man, that is an expensive RP and with all that control it LOOKS like a great trade for the Phils...BUT I have just seen too many BAD trades/signings of high dollar RP to be sanguine about that much capital devoted to one. It just seems like a LOT of RP pitchers go ordinary after 2 years or so.
Miller will not be traded, but this is a fair deal for both sides