Guardians & Mariners
Submitted by: Calvin21
Guardians
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dylan Moore | 31 | Majors | UTIL | OF | High | 2 | 8.2 | 6.8 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.7 |
| Luke Raley | 29 | Majors | OF | 1B | Medium | 5 | 21.4 | 11.3 | 10.1 | 8 | 10.1 | 12.1 |
| Taylor Trammell | 26 | Majors | OF | Medium | 5 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |
| Luis Urias | 27 | Majors | 3B | SS | Low | 2 | 13.2 | 11.8 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
Total Value:
13.1
Mariners
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trevor Stephan | 28 | Majors | RP | Medium | 5 | 35.8 | 22.2 | 13.6 | 10.9 | 13.6 | 16.3 |
Total Value:
13.6
Comments
3Two unneeded utility players and an outfielder that can't hit a lick are not what the Guardians need. Two or three of these players would be DFAed off the Cleveland roster. I don't see Seattle trading Raley, the one worthwhile player in the list. The Mariners acquired him for a definite reason.
Cleveland isn't going to trade a guy they extended for guys who might not even make the roster... Raley would the others, not so much...
No Calvin, the Guardians are not interested in giving Seattle a good RP freshly signed to an inexpensive extension for a bunch of garbage. It's real simple and I'll try to help you out. If you have 4 players that you're trading for one moderately valued player and their combined value doesn't add up to the single player's value then it's a shit deal for the team getting the 4 players. Let's talk about deals that make sense for BOTH teams for a change.
NEWSLETTER? SURE, SIGN ME UP!
