Braves & Guardians
Submitted by: ttubravesrock
Braves
Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tyler Freeman | 24 | Majors | 2B | Medium | 6 | 15.1 | 6.2 | 8.9 | 7.1 | 8.9 | 10.7 | |
Petey Halpin | Minors | OF | 2.4 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 2.9 |
Total Value:
11.3
Guardians
Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ian Anderson | 25 | Majors | SP | Very low | 4 | 16.5 | 5.1 | 11.4 | 9.1 | 11.4 | 14.7 |
Total Value:
11.4
Comments
6Tyler Freeman is stuck behind Giminez, Ramirez, and Rosario in the infield. And they've got Gabriel Arias right behind Freeman and a year younger. Petey Halpin is a pure CF prospect who has been improving his walk rates and strikeout rates. It's also a chance to replenish their prospects who have been traded or graduated. While he's a top 20 prospect with the Guardians he'd become the #10-15 prospect for the Braves. In exchange, they get to fix Ian Anderson, who has 4 years of control left (AND 2 options). Barring injury, I don't see him cracking the Guardians top 5, but if they can bring him back to 2020 Ian Anderson, He could make Civale or Plesac quite tradable.
Tyler Freeman nor Petey Halpin do anything to help the Atlanta Braves in 2023. Ian Anderson might not either. However, if I'm going to bet that one of them will, I'm picking Anderson and mostly just because he's a starting pitcher and I like Orlando Arcia over Tyler Freeman coming off the bench. I don't know what to make of Anderson's 2022. Again, if I'm betting on a biggest improvement in 2023 and it's between Freeman and Anderson I'm picking Anderson again. I'm a Braves fan and I admit to being biased here. It's just too much of a stretch to want these two guys from the Guardians. Freeman's only been in 24 games in the Majors and Halpin's a prospect. The bottom line is that Braves are looking to win now and unless a trade adds there then I doubt there's any practical sense to it. I understand that the Guards might want to move either Civale or Plesac because of the guys knocking on the door. I don't think acquiring Anderson resolves that. For the most part, adding him amounts to rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
I think what you say makes sense MD, I do think you're selling Freeman a bit short though. He's got an excellent glove and bat. He lacks power, but will be a .280-.300 hitter as he always has been. I like Anderson, but like you said it would just be moving the chairs on the deck which is why I suggested getting a 3rd team involved.
Don't underestimate Freeman, who honestly just graduated as a prospect and had one of the best hit tools in all the minors. Though he is closer to a Nick Madigal or DJ LeMahieu (with less power potential). Though I'd agree, I think it would be smarter for the Braves to hold onto a SP over a 2B like Freeman...
Trading capital for a project is not a smart move in my opinion for the Guardians.
I appreciate your consideration from a Cleveland fan's perspective and I actually agree with you. The only thing that counters your line of thought is Cleveland's incredible amount of upper level, quality SP prospects. A 3 team deal with Anderson coming to Cleveland and one of Civale or Plesac going out might be a better way to do it. I give it a thumbs up. Good job!